From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums) |
Date: | 2013-04-30 14:57:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJStyjqp9xSKSgRL_c9t+mYb8H9WsJ1TmBAgFK8Ao-eaw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 April 2013 15:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> ISTM that we also need this patch to put memory barriers in place
>> otherwise the code might be rearranged.
>
> This is simply silly.
You crack me up sometimes. Yes, it is; seem to be having a bad day for thinkos.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2013-04-30 15:03:25 | Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-30 14:51:23 | Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums) |