| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |
| Date: | 2014-02-20 13:45:27 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJLwrHpoUSLRaZ-kPRnbq_8n5o_R79yjr1vxsWao+uzDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 February 2014 16:04, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, *I* don't think this is ready to go. A WAL rate limit that only
> limits WAL sometimes still doesn't impress me.
Could you be specific in your criticism? "Sometimes" wouldn't impress
anybody, but we need to understand whether you are referring to a bug
or just making a personal assessment of the patch features. Thanks.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2014-02-20 14:29:41 | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |
| Previous Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2014-02-20 13:30:48 | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |