From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: feature proposal - triggers by semantics |
Date: | 2012-11-16 04:25:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJKB=pJadWbiqazFM2k6GL7=a4g_vabyf0iO7RPLLZtrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 November 2012 05:25, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 09:48 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>
>> If you want to prevent TRUNCATE, deny the privilege or add a trigger
>> that aborts the command.
>
> You can abort the transaction but not skip action as currently it is only
> possible to skip in ROW level triggers.
>
> So I'd modify this request to allow BEFORE EACH STATEMENT triggers
> to also be able to silently skip current action like BEFORE EACH ROW
> triggers can.
+1
> Then this request would simply be satisfied by a simple trigger which
> rewrites TRUNCATE into DELETE .
However, we don't need to do that to make this work.
Just create a BEFORE EACH STATEMENT trigger on TRUNCATE that issues a
DELETE from table.
Then have a EACH ROW trigger on DELETE.
That way each row gets logged.
The TRUNCATE still occurs, but semantically does nothing, though
physically deletes the space used by the already deleted rows.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-11-16 04:34:47 | Re: logical changeset generation v3 |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2012-11-16 04:14:49 | Re: Do we need so many hint bits? |