From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add ERROR msg for GLOBAL/LOCAL TEMP is not yet implemented |
Date: | 2012-06-10 07:36:59 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJAc0sJbtHMHqPwUk6Yq3YjUEb8E4suD+O4jpRaO+o85Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 9 June 2012 17:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 9 June 2012 16:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I don't believe there was actual consensus for this change,
>
>> It was hardly a subject of marked disagreement.
>
> It was hardly a subject of discussion, as yet.
>
> Personally I'm pretty doubtful about suddenly starting to throw errors
> for syntax we've accepted without complaint for over nine years, on
> merely the grounds that we *might* get around to making it do something
> different in the future. You yourself have complained loudly about
> compatibility breaks that were considerably better founded than this.
>
> Possibly a NOTICE or WARNING (with some other text than this) would be
> a better choice for warning people that a compatibility break might
> be coming.
OK, I will revert pending further discussion and agreement.
The reason for action was simply to close an ubobtrusive open item,
but its clear it wasn't.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-10 07:42:12 | pgsql: Revert error message on GLOBAL/LOCAL pending further discussion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-09 16:19:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add ERROR msg for GLOBAL/LOCAL TEMP is not yet implemented |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-06-10 08:24:29 | Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC |
Previous Message | Brar Piening | 2012-06-10 01:16:03 | Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC |