Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8.

On 4 February 2013 22:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 4 February 2013 21:48, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> We should really freeze the code for 24 hours shouldn't we? That way
>>> we know most, if not all of the buildfarm animals will have had a
>>> chance to go red since the last code change.
>
>> Do whatever you like, as long as you tell me about it.
>
> No, the problem here is *you* didn't tell anybody what you were doing.

Yes I did, I told hackers I was backpatching fixes and later I told
you. Did I follow your timing rules? No, because I've never heard of
them before and didn't know exact deadlines.

Not really clear why there's so much secrecy, but as long as there is,
don't expect me to follow the secret rules and don't dare accuse me of
pushing boundaries because I tried to fix a bug while your invisible
hour-glass ran out.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services