From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
Date: | 2012-04-16 07:54:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+ys55RLktXtDOkXQiaoPbNWqV_8oSgXheQ+ttb1NkLww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 05:46 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> Our problem is not lack of resource, it is ineffective
>> delegation. As Hannu points out, he didn't know the patch would be
>> rejected, so he didn't know help was needed to save something useful.
>> I considered that the job of the CF manager, but perhaps it is was
>> not.
>
>
> Note that one of the influences on the "death march" here was lack of a
> fully devoted CF manager for the full duration. I did some rabble rousing
> to get things started in the usual way, but my time for this only budgeted
> for six weeks in that role. And that was quite optimistic for this one.
>
> Trying to quantify how much time investment the CF manager role really
> involves is one of my important projects to chew on. Whoever ends up doing
> that should at least have an idea what scale of problem they're getting
> into.
Again, if the CF manager role is too big, then we delegate. No reason
why we can't have a CF team, with different people responsible for
different areas.
The key thing is working out how to mobilise the resources we have to
best effect.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-04-16 08:13:37 | Re: Different gettext domain needed for error context |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-04-16 07:48:22 | Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join |