Re: Future In-Core Replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Date: 2012-04-27 18:33:49
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+hhAcDrWg50LhrP-8d4iAdMBrYQx+as4reTq_C0-Dh9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> What I'm hoping to do is to build a basic prototype of logical
>> replication using WAL translation, so we can inspect it to see what
>> the downsides are.
>
> Sounds like Mammoth.  You take a look at that?

Well, they all sound similar. My info was that Mammoth was not WAL-based.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abbas Butt 2012-04-27 18:36:59 Re: A problem with dump/restore of views containing whole row references
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-04-27 18:29:36 Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)