Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-10-11 20:37:24
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+hgas3Jv2kMbJ2nRiKwxiMA7CArzf4uu0UW3DnR6u9jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Standard conforming strings
> was tricky because it was more user-facing, or certainly SQL-facing.

Why is SQL more important than backup?

There is no good reason to do this so quickly.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-10-11 20:37:38 Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-11 20:35:33 Re: Dumping roles improvements?