From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tweaking Foreign Keys for larger tables |
Date: | 2014-11-06 08:58:37 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+_MY_G5JK3O_Zp2HS5guT7kA-X2Lfa78KsdWXXeYR5JA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 November 2014 21:15, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 10/31/14 6:19 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Various ways of tweaking Foreign Keys are suggested that are helpful
>> for larger databases.
>
>> * INITIALLY NOT ENFORCED
>> FK created, but is not enforced during DML.
>> Will be/Must be marked NOT VALID when first created.
>> We can run a VALIDATE on the constraint at any time; if it passes the
>> check it is marked VALID and presumed to stay that way until the next
>> VALIDATE run.
>
> Does that mean the FK would become invalid after every DML operation,
> until you expicitly revalidate it? Is that practical?
I think so.
We store the validity on the relcache entry.
Constraint would add a statement-level after trigger for insert,
update, delete and trigger, which issues a relcache invalidation if
the state was marked valid. Marked as deferrable initially deferred.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-11-06 09:18:26 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-11-06 08:49:56 | Re: Tweaking Foreign Keys for larger tables |