Re: Temporary tables under hot standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Date: 2012-04-26 12:42:30
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+T+KzBA-yeegO7VEYYPDMJDegXjjVwzEtbWpBADy6TNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

>> So, I can't help wonder if what we're really missing here is a
>> high-performance, log-based logical replication solution with good
>> core support.

On that, we do agree completely. That is exactly my goal for 9.3.

> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward that,
> by providing a way to translate the WAL stream to a series of
> notifications of logical events to clients which register with
> xReader.

This is already nearly finished in prototype and will be published in
May. Andres Freund is working on it, copied here. It looks like there
is significant overlap there.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-26 12:52:13 Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-26 12:41:33 Future In-Core Replication