Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Misa Simic <misa(dot)simic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays
Date: 2012-06-17 13:10:01
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+O1+rObegvm671_dfz9Tttsi3sBvtuHJaxNLvKz=6U+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 June 2012 19:16, Misa Simic <misa(dot)simic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> IMO, both approaches make sense...

Agreed.

It's also a good reason to do as Peter suggests and come up with a
better description than just EACH.

Do we need something like Exclusion FKs? i.e. the FK partner of
Exclusion Constraints?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-06-17 13:23:38 Re: Backup docs
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-06-17 13:01:53 Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API