Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Date: 2013-06-16 09:55:20
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+MqVbMC3AS57-n2MN1NuMCeM5UKEe76Y0WH0doEKN5aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 June 2013 17:21, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 16:10 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Jeff Davis has a patch pending
>> (1365493015(dot)7580(dot)3240(dot)camel(at)sussancws0025) that passes the buffer_std
>> flag down to MarkBufferDirtyHint() for exactly that reason. I thought we
>> were on track committing that, but rereading the thread it doesn't look
>> that way.
>>
>> Jeff, care to update that patch?
>
> Rebased and attached. Changed so all callers use buffer_std=true except
> those in freespace.c and fsmpage.c.
>
> Simon, did you (or anyone else) have an objection to this patch? If not,
> I'll go ahead and commit it tomorrow morning.

I didn't have a specific objection to the patch, I just wanted to
minimise change relating to this so we didn't introduce further bugs.

I've no objection to you committing that.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2013-06-16 10:16:59 Re: pluggable compression support
Previous Message Liming Hu 2013-06-16 05:05:57 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch