Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted
Date: 2013-02-07 08:35:15
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+Aw_RiDA7mnqUCBHoPfLr04p9__fqbSRntUehwv9eybw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 February 2013 05:39, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> While stress testing Pavan's 2nd pass vacuum visibility patch, I realized
> that vacuum/visibility was busted. But it wasn't his patch that busted it.
> As far as I can tell, the bad commit was in the range
> 692079e5dcb331..168d3157032879

Please define "busted" so we can all help track this down.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-02-07 08:41:39 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-02-07 08:28:53 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY