From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Will switchover still need a checkpoint in 9.1 SR Hot Standby |
Date: | 2011-08-07 09:01:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+8sGAOrrTSfSYwSJn3jKVEkXNmSBkLALw22p2Vombhbg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> In 9.0 (as in earlier versions) a former standby host has to do a full
> checkpoint before becoming available as an independent database instance
> in either switchover or failover scenarios.
>
> For most combinations of of bigger than minimal shared buffers and
> non-memory-speed disks this can take from several seconds to tens of
> minutes on busy systems.
For switchover, you issue a checkpoint first, to reduce this time as
much as possible.
> Is the pre-activation checkpoint still required in 9.1 ?
Yes, but I've found a way to remove them in 9.2 and will be patching that soon.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2011-08-07 09:15:30 | Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API |
Previous Message | Tim | 2011-08-07 08:23:26 | Re: vacuumlo patch |