Re: Release notes & git attribution

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release notes & git attribution
Date: 2013-02-08 10:02:46
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+8foGV5puQ46Vdmr35kO5F=zReYXxZU5JuzbSOZQbvOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 February 2013 09:43, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:

> No big deal, it was just one space, but I wanted to voice my
> disagreement with how Postgres committers don't retain original patch
> authorship information.

I agree its very important to get that right.

It's important for the PostgreSQL project to encourage further
contribution by acknowledging and celebrating contributions, as well
as allowing external observers to see that work was done successfully
by particular people to confirm further sponsorship/time allocation
etc. That practice has long been followed and encouraged by the core
team and committers.

Some mistakes are made from time to time but there is a willingness to
make corrections to that.

I'll look into this.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2013-02-08 10:23:52 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2013-02-08 09:43:51 Release notes & git attribution