From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | senthilnathan <senthilnathan(dot)t(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backup's from standby |
Date: | 2011-08-16 12:51:51 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+20KrEmb+f71J6c1jN6oKg2iYO_b+ZjQhF489Zs74=Bg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:34 AM, senthilnathan
<senthilnathan(dot)t(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> What will happen if you issue *checkpoint* at STANDBY. I presume that it
> will flush the data to the disk.
Yes. On the standby that is known as a restartpoint.
> Will there be any conflict with the master WAL.(like checkpoint location...)
No, there is no effect on the master. The restartpoint happens as a
background process on the standby, so replay will continue while we
restart.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-08-16 12:54:45 | Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-16 12:34:34 | Re: Backup's from standby |