Re: getting rid of "thread fork emulation" in pgbench?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting rid of "thread fork emulation" in pgbench?
Date: 2015-03-30 12:34:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmobxSjRe-aWS3WBnJ3Kv84gcapr1zbcKwQKN8+eGkEJbww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>> I really, really wish you'd stop arguing against the patch to allow
>> merging of pgbench logs in this basis.
>
> Hmmm. I'm lost. I thought that discussing how to best implement a feature
> was part of reviewing a patch.

Of course it is. But the feature you are talking about and the
feature Tomas is talking about are two different features.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-03-30 13:29:23 Re: Relation extension scalability
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2015-03-30 12:25:14 Re: Combining Aggregates