From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started |
Date: | 2012-07-03 14:58:21 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobwff9vmkAOge=OrtyDbQgQ_F5oUfp=BhOzo3xxoq2Vcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> The attached patch is delivered from the discussion around row-level
> access control feature. A problem Florian pointed out is refcursor
> declared in security definer function. Even though all the permission
> checks are applied based on privilege of the owner of security-definer
> function in case when it tries to define a cursor bound to a particular
> query, it shall be executed under the credential of executor.
> In the result, "current_user" or "has_table_privilege()" will return
> unexpected result, even if it would be used in as a part of security
> policy for each row.
Why not just save and restore the user ID and security context
unconditionally, instead of doing this kind of dance?
+ if (portal->userId != GetUserId())
+ SetUserIdAndSecContext(portal->userId, portal->secCo
+ else
+ saveUserId = InvalidOid;
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-03 15:02:15 | Re: [PATCH 08/16] Introduce the ApplyCache module which can reassemble transactions from a stream of interspersed changes |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-07-03 14:26:08 | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |