Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-31 15:33:02
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobv_WWvOsB7mE_Y+ni9Vt1TUNNds4qYzzrvXW6jrknnxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:52 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a patch for that. I now think
> a7097ca630a25dd2248229f21ebce4968d85d10a was actually misguided, and
> served only to mask some of the failures caused by waiting for the WAL
> summary file.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-01-31 15:34:13 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-31 15:31:57 Re: Incorrect cost for MergeAppend