| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Volker Aßmann <volker(dot)assmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |
| Date: | 2015-05-07 20:47:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobuF2CdDm=W-gi1XK9OT3kcck511UHigWtC0mus1scGPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I realize it's not going to be popular, but I'd love to have 'trust'
> only allowed if a command-line option is passed to the postmaster or
> something along those lines. It's really got no business being an
> option for a network service like PG.
I disagree wholeheartedly. There is such a thing as a trusted network.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-05-07 20:49:27 | Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-05-07 20:42:26 | Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2) |