From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2011-07-20 18:55:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobtSLT_NC6QW1Bb-9X_J0zsZ65LwoWdvMpmY_0_h7G5zQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I am assuming that's a "yes" to both the directions: older -> newer , and
>> newer -> older minor releases.
>
> Yes, I believe both directions would work unless we mentioned it the
> release notes, in which cases it might not work, or might work older to
> newer but newer to older.
I don't see how this would get broken in a minor release. We'd have
to change the WAL format or the tuple format, which is definitely not
minor release material.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vick Khera | 2011-07-20 19:04:22 | Re: announcements regarding tools |
Previous Message | Vibhor Kumar | 2011-07-20 18:53:53 | Re: COPY TO '|gzip > /my/cool/file.gz' |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-20 18:58:04 | WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-07-20 18:53:07 | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |