Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date: 2019-02-22 18:15:35
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobt7gJ5pR2tJjUvFGmH1zW4PncL2MrM=1QuRWJP-eHx1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Why? It would likely be a significant amount of effort and added overhead,
> to accomplish no obviously-useful goal.
>
> Note that all the temp schemas are made as owned by the bootstrap
> superuser, so there is no real argument to be made that people might
> be expecting they should be able to delete them.

Hmm, well maybe you're right. Just seems like an odd wart.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shawn Debnath 2019-02-22 18:18:57 Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-02-22 18:14:35 Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash