Re: superuser() shortcuts

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: superuser() shortcuts
Date: 2014-11-26 13:02:19
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobsya7XLK0ag0RYCafenSkjrrw04N38Cf5SM7zf=0hK5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm not really particular about which way we go with the specific
>> wording (suggestions welcome..) but the inconsistency should be dealt
>> with.
>
> Meh.

+1 for "meh". I don't mind making things consistent if it can be done
while maintaining or improving the absolute quality of those error
messages -- but if the changes involve a loss of detail, or moving
information that used to be in the main error message into the detail,
then I don't think it's worth it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-11-26 13:06:00 Re: 9.2 recovery/startup problems
Previous Message Alex Shulgin 2014-11-26 12:53:48 Follow up to irc on CREATE INDEX vs. maintenance_work_mem on 9.3