Re: Support "make check" for PGXS extensions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support "make check" for PGXS extensions
Date: 2025-03-20 23:55:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmobraSH1a4Nfv9T5rYZvFPxst0PjAk7Cxn1yi4cYKCzRgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 1:57 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> > I LOVE this idea!
> +many

Same here. But I also agree with Andrew that it would be fantastic if
TAP tests could be made to work, too. Yet, anything beats nothing!

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-03-21 00:02:36 Re: dblink: Add SCRAM pass-through authentication
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-20 23:54:20 Re: Have postgres.bki self-identify