Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
Date: 2022-01-24 19:27:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmobrQPt_=uL9dzns3J8V8Rs97rNw8MCx37bC8R-7=63=Lw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Well if we can get Andres' suggestion to work all this might go away,
> which would keep everyone happy, especially me. You're right that I was
> a little careless upthread. Mea culpa. Meanwhile I am committing a
> minimal one line fix.

I in no way intended to accuse you of being careless. I was just
pointing out that this stuff seems to be hard to get right, even for
smart people.

I really hate committing stuff that turns out to be broken. It's such
a fire drill when the build farm turns red.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-01-24 19:44:10 Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-01-24 19:19:50 Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies