Re: Add a GUC check hook to ensure summarize_wal cannot be enabled when wal_level is minimal

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add a GUC check hook to ensure summarize_wal cannot be enabled when wal_level is minimal
Date: 2024-07-18 16:27:27
Message-ID: CA+TgmobqJbsD9h26Yu6eTXKqhivO1Jz797zf0fNBpS19AhnTTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:47 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> "WAL not generated under wal_level=minimal" sounds a bit confusing??
> How about "WAL generated while wal_level is replica or higher" instead?

Committed and back-patched to 17 with approximately that change, but
reworded slightly to make the tenses work.

I just realized that I should've created a CF entry for this so that
it went through CI before actually committing it. Let's see how long
it takes for me to get punished for that oversight...

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-07-18 16:30:29 Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Previous Message Paul Smith* 2024-07-18 15:19:31 Re: filesystem full during vacuum - space recovery issues