Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
Date: 2011-10-21 03:01:52
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobp=c7vwW3FdbsnTZeb9GVe88KXbYjy=7ED-CzMKKSoyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> OK, so this is an artifact of the changes to make libpq communication
>> bidirectional.  But I'm still confused about where the error is coming
>> from.  In your OP, you wrote "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver
>> detects an error while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits
>> ERROR even if there are data available in the receive buffer."  So
>> that implied to me that this is only going to trigger if you have a
>> shutdown together with an awkwardly-timed error.  But your scenario
>> for reproducing this problem doesn't seem to involve an error.
>
> Yes, my scenario doesn't cause any real error. My original description was
> misleading. The following would be closer to the truth:
>
>    "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver detects the termination of replication
>    connection while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits ERROR
>    even if there are data available in the receive buffer."

Ah, OK. I think I now agree that this is a bug and that we should fix
and back-patch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-10-21 03:40:26 funny lock mode in DropTrigger
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-10-21 01:51:01 Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication