Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-01-09 18:40:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmobnhPN6Mprt8X-W61BKOM-_EVcHhQ+Ca0THdBxUGMyzTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, now that there's 3 places that need to do almost the same thing, I
> think it'd be best to just centralize this somewhere. I realize that's not
> going to save any significant amount of code, but it would make it crystal
> clear what's going on (assuming the excellent comment above RIGHTMOST_ONE
> was kept).

Hmm. This sounds a lot like what fls() and my_log2() also do. I've
been quietly advocating for fls() because we only provide an
implementation in src/port if the operating system doesn't have it,
and the operating system may have an implementation that optimizes to
a single machine-language instruction (bsrl on x86, I think, see
4f658dc851a73fc309a61be2503c29ed78a1592e). But the fact that our
src/port implementation uses a loop instead of the RIGHTMOST_ONE()
trick seems non-optimal.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-09 19:10:25 Re: ALTER TABLE .. ALTER COLUMN .. ERROR: attribute .. has wrong type
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-09 18:34:03 Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE