Re: GROUPING

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GROUPING
Date: 2015-05-21 16:24:03
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobn+7otsT6aBzFnJ=qZ3guG4HFqDsf3r5Px8whPPudocA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" == David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>
> David> How about a more sensible data structure as a PG-specific addon.
> David> GROUPING_JSON() seems like just the thing.
>
> What exactly do you think it should return?

I vote for { "rube" : "goldberg" }.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2015-05-21 16:24:31 Re: GROUPING
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2015-05-21 16:21:52 Re: GROUPING