From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pageinspect: Try to fix some bugs in previous commit. |
Date: | 2017-02-03 21:35:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobmVxe60_Odg1tdaA73G=RZemcWdVH07zhh3b4SwoeuBA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> One thing to think about is what will happen if someday we want to use
> 64-bit hash codes (a day I think is not that far away). It sounds like
> you've already chosen bigint for any output field that represents a
> hash code or a related value such as a mask ... but it wouldn't hurt
> to look through the fields with that in mind.
Yeah, I think we're fine on that score.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-03 22:17:37 | pgsql: Improve grammar of message about two-phase state files. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-03 21:34:12 | pgsql: pageinspect: More type-sanity surgery on the new hash index code |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-03 21:37:08 | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |
Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2017-02-03 21:24:35 | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |