| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: advance local xmin more aggressively |
| Date: | 2015-01-15 19:57:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobmH6rR6CKUqxN_jwCNq7A=W2v78K-KCa+GpSeB8PYejg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
>> committed, and fixing those bugs.
> So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?
Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find
the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for
that. But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody
notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-15 19:58:18 | Re: __attribute__ for non-gcc compilers |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2015-01-15 19:32:42 | Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop |