From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Date: | 2017-08-18 15:28:18 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobkxXx4X5TokKyNT-C4Sg7MCOt9vhjgnog9yQiOEOq26A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I had in mind a ereport(WARNING) in create_syncrep_config. Extra
> thoughts/opinions welcome.
I think for v10 we should just document the behavior we've got; I
think it's too late to be whacking things around now.
For v11, we could emit a warning if we plan to deprecate and
eventually remove the syntax without ANY/FIRST, but let's not do:
WARNING: what you did is ok, but you might have wanted to do something else
First of all, whether or not that can properly be called a warning is
highly debatable. Also, if you do that sort of thing to your spouse
and/or children, they call it "nagging". I don't think users will
like it any more than family members do.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Douglas Doole | 2017-08-18 15:42:43 | Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-18 14:45:10 | Re: Proposal: global index |