Re: Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server crash (FailedAssertion) due to catcache refcount mis-handling
Date: 2017-08-13 21:47:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmobkOC79CxwN7f2287aVv3zRg7CRMJYi2aHVhAt5nietkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Not having heard anyone arguing against that, I'll go make it so,
> ie AtEOXact_CatCache is toast in all branches.

Great, thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-08-13 22:18:18 Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-13 21:43:10 Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly