From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string) |
Date: | 2011-09-07 20:30:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobjp4zgy-vRznJ2NEZJBjgfTXEP1PRZnAQrgNfW=mJkaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> A mishandled encoding conversion could be problematic, so that needs to
>>> be carefully considered (perhaps just shut off unconditionally).
>
>> It's not really a problem for the postmaster if something just plain
>> old fails. Where we get into trouble is if it manages to (a) crash,
>> (b) take an excessive amount of time to complete, or (c) screw up the
>> postmaster state in some way we can't recover from. But if any of
>> those are an issue then, yeah, just shut it off.
>
> Keep in mind that in the postmaster, elog(ERROR) *is* a crash.
Right... but a function that returns -1 to indicate that something
didn't work should be OK, as long as whatever it does is otherwise
extremely boring.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-09-07 20:30:33 | Re: [PATCH] Don't truncate integer part in to_char for 'FM99.' |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-07 20:28:41 | Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held |