Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables
Date: 2017-03-31 19:32:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmobjK4F7Nd5cM=6ygCnC0g8Do=RP7pTWsUJZYe5SxbzXhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Committed after rewording the documentation.
>
> Hm. Wonder if something like that shouldn't be backpatched - because
> otherwise using postgres_fdw from an old server against a newer one will
> do weird stuff. I don't know what kind of policy we've committed to
> with postgresImportForeignSchema...

I don't think I'd like to promise that postgres_fdw will always be
forward-compatible. Backward-compatibility is hard enough already.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-31 19:34:57 Re: Allow to specify #columns in heap/index_form_tuple
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-31 19:31:35 Re: postgres_fdw IMPORT SCHEMA and partitioned tables