Re: State of pg_createsubscriber

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: State of pg_createsubscriber
Date: 2024-06-19 12:04:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmobjDu+qnGYdgkNYfrP+sr0CLF+r-w37y_sw=ajE1Mc4sg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:55 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We can close the open item pointing to this thread.

Done, and for the record I also asked for the thread to be split, back
on May 22.

IMHO, we shouldn't add open items pointing to general complaints like
the one that started this thread. Open items need to be specific and
actionable.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-19 12:20:08 Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
Previous Message Shubham Khanna 2024-06-19 12:00:06 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns