From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Date: | 2022-02-14 17:27:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobiR3MTVknmrUFhKLKUpmihucyHJFxqrqkdj-cYqZ6cMA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:26 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So do we have consensus to use (STRATEGY = LOG/CHECKPOINT or do we
> think that keeping it bool i.e. Is LOG_COPIED_BLOCKS a better option?
> Once we have consensus on this I will make this change and
> documentation as well along with the other changes suggested by
> Robert.
I think we have consensus on STRATEGY. I'm not sure if we have
consensus on what the option values should be. If we had an option to
use fs-based cloning, that would also need to issue a checkpoint,
which makes me think that CHECKPOINT is not the best name.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-02-14 17:31:25 | Re: fixing bookindex.html bloat |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2022-02-14 17:25:36 | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |