Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date: 2022-02-02 15:14:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmobiKLXne-2AVzYyWRiO8=rChBQ=7ywoxp=2SmcFw=oDDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:35 PM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
<ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, at 17:33, Robert Haas wrote:
> > LGTM. Committed.
>
> Thanks!

It appears that neither of us actually tested that this works. For me,
it works when I test as a superuser, but if I test as a non-superuser
with or without pg_write_server_files, it crashes, because we end up
trying to do syscache lookups without a transaction environment. I
*think* that the attached is a sufficient fix; at least, it passes
simple testing.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-server-crash-bug-in-server-backup-target.patch application/octet-stream 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-02-02 15:15:05 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Previous Message Pavel Borisov 2022-02-02 15:10:23 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15