| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes? |
| Date: | 2015-06-24 21:08:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobi92_5_fepjhPC+wHVfXGY5_Ckz7PCdwrKg0bjz3+h_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 6/24/15 3:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Meh. The relevant branches already exist, as you can disable it today.
>>
>> We could also just change the default in the back branches.
>
> One more argument for leaving everything alone. If users don't like it,
> they can turn it off themselves.
I find it very hard to disagree with that perspective.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-24 21:20:31 | Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-06-24 20:22:41 | Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts |