| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)freebsd(dot)org>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |
| Date: | 2011-10-14 15:18:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobhd=r229U1KYPOR0OQg3v6+qaN3skf4OA3BO432OZzAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> OK. But if we are pretty sure we don't want something, e.g. hibernate,
> we shouldn't add it.
Fair enough, but I'm not even slightly sure that we don't want that.
I think having prewarming utilities available as contrib modules or on
PGXN would be useful, but integrating something into the backend would
allow it to be far more automated.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-14 15:21:48 | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-14 15:12:57 | Re: pg_comments (was: Allow \dd to show constraint comments) |