| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Subject: | Re: random failing builds on spoonbill - backends not exiting... |
| Date: | 2012-06-22 23:06:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobhPCgDjtRP-omYbmrs8MoZWL8uUYFNhb9HDNrs=znYDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 22, 2012 08:51:55 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
>>
>> <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
>> > sending a manual kill -15 to either of them does not seem to make them
>> > exit either...
>> >
>> > I did some further investiagations with robert on IM but I don't think
>> > he has any further ideas other than that I have a weird OS :)
>> > It seems worth noticing that this is OpenBSD 5.1 on Sparc64 which has a
>> > new threading implementation compared to older OpenBSD versions.
>>
>> I remarked to Stefan that the symptoms seem consistent with the idea
>> that the children have signals blocked. But I don't know how that
>> could happen.
> You cannot block sigkill.
Obviously. The issue is: the postmaster apparently sent SIGTERM (15)
to all of these children, and yet they're not dead; and a manual
SIGTERM doesn't kill them either. I'm sure SIGKILL (9) would do the
trick, but then it's not a clean shutdown.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-22 23:09:11 | Re: COMMUTATOR doesn't seem to work |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-22 21:53:16 | Re: random failing builds on spoonbill - backends not exiting... |