From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 release schedule |
Date: | 2012-07-23 14:12:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobgg1n5j_diHrLVtb8Jp9oOw8XgeDqhRbVhJ3TutoT8qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It looks like the most optimistic schedule we could possibly make,
> assuming no show-stopper bugs are reported, is:
>
> * Wrap beta3 on August 2 for release Monday Aug 6
>
> * RC1 two weeks later (release Aug 20)
>
> * 9.2.0 two weeks after that (release Sept 3)
>
> Now that schedule isn't actually going to work so far as the USA
> contingent is concerned, because Sept 3 is Labor Day. But we could
> figure that there's room for one week's slip in there, either for
> RC1 or final, giving us a release date of Sept 10.
>
> Again, this is assuming no major bugs are found to force more slippage
> or additional betas/RCs. But I think it's reasonable to shoot for
> If All Goes Well.
>
> Comments, objections?
Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
things from the list of open items. I don't think all of the things
listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
to be done about some of the things that are there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-23 14:17:39 | Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-23 14:08:46 | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |