Re: upper planner path-ification

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: upper planner path-ification
Date: 2015-06-23 13:18:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmobgWKHfZc09B+s2LxJTwoRD5Ht-avoVDvaQ4+RpwrO4bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> So, unless we don't find out a solution around planner, 2-phase aggregation is
> like a curry without rice....

Simon and I spoke with Tom about this upper planner path-ification
problem at PGCon, and he indicated that he intended to work on it
soon, and that we should bug him about it if he doesn't.

I'm pleased to here this as I seem to have a special talent in that area.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-06-23 13:20:21 Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2015-06-23 13:09:10 Re: [PATCH] introduce XLogLockBlockRangeForCleanup()