Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks
Date: 2020-01-28 20:54:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmobgCUY53tomz=PC8uRAdvC7TRYuC=Txe3Gy8m7yXZXMHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:13 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> No, that's not right. I think that it is possible to loop over
> ShmemProtectiveRegion in some cases. And actually, your patch is dead
> wrong because this is some code called by the postmaster and it cannot
> use FATAL.

Uh, really? I am not aware of such a rule.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-01-28 20:58:28 Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-01-28 20:52:36 Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions