Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Date: 2016-02-11 17:18:30
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobft858D8YHOMAUDY31d5Li1wt6p0-MvYeTVwo0UkoBqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> This brings me to something related: I'm wondering if we shouldn't merge
>> unix/win32_latch.c.
>
> Well, it's duplicated code on the one hand versus maze-of-ifdefs on the
> other. Feel free to try it and see, but I'm unsure it'd be an improvement.

I think we should either get this fixed RSN or revert the problematic
commit until we get it fixed. I'd be rather disappointed about the
latter because I think this was a very good thing on the merits, but
probably not good enough to justify taking the performance hit over
the long term.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-02-11 17:29:16 pl/pgsql exported functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-02-11 17:11:26 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution.