Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2024-04-30 16:24:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmobfDJuXJATNUco+g6AiUb3WS2Pi9FrJe9hKAHGw37RX-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 3:41 PM Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/26/24 12:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I think this thread should be added to the open items list.
>
> Thanks! I sent a request to pgsql-www to get edit permission. I didn't realize there was a wiki page
> tracking things like this. I agree it needs to be fixed if we want to include the feature.

Great, I see that it's on the list now.

Peter, could you have a look at
http://postgr.es/m/47550967-260b-4180-9791-b224859fe63e@illuminatedcomputing.com
and express an opinion about whether each of those proposals are (a)
good or bad ideas and (b) whether they need to be fixed for the
current release?

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2024-04-30 16:39:24 Re: SQL:2011 application time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-30 14:32:46 Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation