Re: Updating parallel.sgml's treatment of parallel joins

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updating parallel.sgml's treatment of parallel joins
Date: 2018-03-22 17:26:55
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobcff4DwyFgAXOB_m9q2ZMbXyx1a9KidHSHZhy=bPiEmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is an attempt at updating parallel.sgml to cover Parallel Hash.
> I will be neither surprised nor offended if Robert would like to put
> it differently!

Looks nice. Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-22 17:28:52 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-03-22 17:17:41 Re: pgstat_report_activity() and parallel CREATE INDEX (was: Parallel index creation & pg_stat_activity)