| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing WITH clause support in CREATE FUNCTION, for isCachable and isStrict |
| Date: | 2018-01-26 17:39:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobc4+n=qaecX-M1XHC4XQAvBLwxZtuLDLGuLJNWiK7dtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 06:30:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> In short, I'm on board with removing the WITH clause. I've not
>>> reviewed the patch in detail, but will do so and push it if there's
>>> not objections pretty soon.
>
>> Glad to hear that, thanks!
>
> And done. I failed to resist the temptation to rename
> compute_attributes_sql_style, since the "sql_style" bit no longer
> conveys anything. I'd always found compute_attributes_with_style
> to be confusingly named --- seemed like it should have a sibling
> compute_attributes_gracelessly, or something like that.
+1 for compute_attributes_gracelessly! :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-26 17:46:56 | Re: [HACKERS] generated columns |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-26 17:30:12 | Re: Removing WITH clause support in CREATE FUNCTION, for isCachable and isStrict |