Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02/04/15 21:21, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I
>>> made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without breaking anything
>>> in the process:
>>>
>>> - I adjusted things for recent commits around INT{32,63}_{MIN_MAX}.
>>> - I removed (void) ssup; which I do not think is normal PostgreSQL style.
>>> - Removed the #if DEC_DIGITS != 4 check. The comment is great, but I
>>> think we don't need protect against #if 0 code get re-enabled.
>>> - I removed the too-clever (at least IMHO) handing of TRACE_SORT in
>>> favor of just using #ifdef around each occurrence.
>>> - I also declared trace_sort in guc.h, where various other GUCs are
>>> declared, instead of declaring it privately in each file that needed
>>> it.
>>> - Changed some definitions to depend on SIZEOF_DATUM rather than
>>> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL. Hopefully I didn't muff this; please check it.
>>> - Fixed an OID conflict.
>>> - And of course, bumped catversion.
>>
>>
>> And that's broken the buildfarm. Argh.
>
> That's because of this:
>
> +#ifdef SIZEOF_DATUM == 8
>
> You need just #if there.

Thanks. I actually pushed a fix for that about 25 minutes ago;
hopefully that is all that is needed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company