Re: One question about security label command

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, 张元超 <zhangyuanchao(at)highgo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One question about security label command
Date: 2015-03-11 16:15:32
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob_YScNndPsvyyucvd0=0pPfSTZWO0987+LgWH8kxd1oQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED is suitable error code here.
> Please see the attached one.

Committed. I did not bother back-patching this, but I can do that if
people think it's important. The sepgsql regression tests don't seem
to pass for me any more; I wonder if some expected-output changes are
needed as a result of core changes.

I'm guessing these tests are not running in an automated fashion anywhere?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
regression.diffs application/octet-stream 6.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-03-11 16:26:04 Re: procost for to_tsvector
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-03-11 16:08:25 Re: mogrify and indent features for jsonb